It depends on where you are starting. For me it was easier because I based mine on historical/reconstructed languages (Selanese - proto-Slavic, Tunglanese - Classical Chinese). It could be quite difficult if you are starting a completely new language and avoiding getting influenced by historical languages.
(male listener): Mea teachsábh tá ód ...? (female listener): Mea teachsábha ant ód ...? (plural male/mixed listeners): Mea teachsábham tém ód ...? (plural female listeners): Mea teachsábhann ténn ód ...?
Despite the notice, other regions keep sending unsolicited embassy requests. The current number already makes us look like an embassy collector, and it’s not giving us a good image.
One may have noticed, but my activity on NS is decreasing dramatically over time, and one day I might just leave together. However, currently, I have not found anyone trustworthy enough to be the successor. In that case, I’ll keep the region up but effectively “close” it, by setting up a password. Therefore, I’m considering closing embassies with irrelevant regions. At that time you’ll be free to stay or leave the region. But this hasn’t been confirmed.
I'm assuming (IO) stands for indirect object; it's interesting that asiikuvena and emnian have a different order of objects (indirect objects precede direct objects in Emnian)
a more detailed schematic of the Emnian sentence would be: ⦁ ‣ Finite verb ⦁ ‣ Subject ⦁ ‣ Non-finite verb(s) ⦁ ‣ Indirect object (with le) ⦁ ‣ Direct object (with a) ⦁ ‣ Prepositional objects and adverbs
any element EXCEPT the subject can be moved in front of the finite verb for emphasis, but only one element may ever precede the finite verb in a given sentence