Post

Region: Right to Life

LodgedFromMessages
The Christian Socialist Republic of Culture of Life

The Gallant Old Republic wrote:Today the BBC had the following article on a Jewish doctor who performed secret abortions in Auschwitz on the main page:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200526-dr-gisella-perl-the-auschwitz-doctor-who-saved-lives

I was very frustrated by this article which omitted so many key details to understanding the situation but, most of all, I strongly disliked its inability to distinguish clearly between 1) the author's, 2) the doctor's, 3) Jewish, 4) the random "experts" the interview about ethics views on abortion. The entire premise of the article's headline, for example, is that she violated the Hippocratic oath by performing these abortions, and yet the author doesn't seem to think this is part of it....? It makes it clear that she terribly regretted the things she felt she had to do, and yet she then co-authored articles with an abortion advocate? This seems to me to be a sign of the general incomprehensibility/irrationality of most modern pro-abortion argumentation.

I agree that the article is deeply confused. The person it's profiling seems to have been pro-life in theory. However, it makes her out as if she were some kind of proponent of "reproductive rights" (the article's term).

She authored two articles with Alan Guttmacher in the mid-1950s -- on trichomoniasis and yeast infections. I don't think that makes a person an abortion supporter, especially given that Guttmacher was not yet vocal about his views.

ContextReport