Okay, firstly, sometimes women get pregnant accidentally even with protection or the man leaves them during pregnancy, making having a child financially impossible for example, thus subjecting both the woman and the child to life in extreme poverty, which could easily be avoided by abortion. Secondly, why do men even get to decide whether abortion should be legal? We literally can't get pregnant, we don't know what it feels like to have a child. Thirdly, you didn't mention the pregnancy being dangerous to the woman as a reason for abortion.
And finally, it's not a baby, it's a foetus. It can't think, it can't feel pain at early stages (as far as I'm aware), and it just plainly isn't a human and thus shouldn't get human rights. It could be a human in the future, sure, but by that logic we'll all be dead in the future so we don't deserve rights. It is a part of a woman, and the woman should do whatever she wants with it
Prov, United gorthwaystalve, and Dead warrior daddy
Northeastern italian
I disagree. Financial status is no reason not to have a child, if you have the ability to have unprotected (or sometimes with) sex and get pregnant you are fully capable of having a child. I don't know if you know but there are many struggling mothers giving their all to their offspring, this is maternal love, now you deny a child simply because you can change your life condition? This is cowardly and an insult to all mothers around the world. Can't men decide together with women? Wasn't it men who passed so many laws protecting women? Now they can no longer give advice on abortion?
Indeed, pregnancy can be dangerous, but depending on the degree of danger in pregnancy I understand A LITTLE but in other cases I don't. Would you woman deny having a child, something so blessed to go through pregnancy turmoil? Do you know how many mothers held out until the end? Want a story of overcoming??? JUST TODAY my teacher talked about this case, and from a student who started to argue with another about abortion, the story follows: I could very well have been aborted, my mother when she got pregnant She went through many difficulties, she could die, the doctors gave her the option but she denied it, thanks to that I am here alive and I thank her and God for not letting her carry out the act.
And even worse, would you abort your child just because it wasn't planned? Just because it can change your life you'll kill a child.
What you said to me was a total disregard for life and an insult to the child. Only if you are tested regularly will you only discover the baby when he is in the second or third month, At this stage (and before) the baby is already in pain and is going to suffer, Would you feel proud murdering children just because you didn't plan for them, or because you just don't want to? Do you know how cruel and disrespectful that sounded? A child is a blessing, If you had gone through the situation of almost being aborted you wouldn't have the vision you have now!
And sorry for the huge text, I'm very emotional about it
While I agree, the real argument is…Can the government ask your doctor about a medical procedure? Or is this confidential? The government has NO RIGHT to ask your doctor if you did something to your body. That is what Roe v Wade says.
Prov, Northeastern italian, and Dead warrior daddy
It sounds like you're making the case that abortion is bad because it prevents a potential person from existing and growing up. However, from that point of view, since every single ovum has the capability to someday become a person, not allowing each and every one to be fertilized is preventing a potential person from existing and growing up...
Point? No no, I'm not participating in the abortion argument, I'm just answering a biology question
Glorious mikhail gorbachev
Northeastern italian
Exactly, the ovum is part of the process of creating a fetus that will one day be born and grow, and I didn't understand where the Gemeinschaftsland wanted to arrive
Hi I really don't want to get into an NSG-scale argument (on abortion of all things), but I'd just like ask why some people value the fetus > the woman, since a lot of arguments boil down to that.
Even if we were to just accept that abortion were wrong because a fetus has the potential to become a human life… So does an ovum, and you explicitly endorsed safe sex, which prevents an ovum from being fertilized, and thus prevents a human life from coming to be.
A national referendum on joining the ETO/EU was held in the Moscowian Republic. The vote count showed 53% for abstention and 47% for joining. The Liberal Democratic Party of Moscowian reacted to this with regret. The Social Democratic Party explains this by the mentality of Muscovians, namely their respect for sovereignty (in their understanding, joining this union would somehow reduce our sovereignty). Representatives of the National Conservative Party of Moscowian believe that there are advantages in this in fact already in our relations with the participating countries unilaterally. We already have a visa-free regime, and trade agreements are regularly signed and updated (Liberals argue with them about this). The Government of the Moscowian Republic believes that the advantages of the ETO/EU are still insufficient (at least for citizens who would vote For it). Simply put, we will observe.
The Greater Hegemony Republic of Bursken
The Artificial Ignorance of UPC-3PO
Sanjurika if you have any questions :)
The Démocratique Socialiste of Prov
The Best Football Club of Mancheseva City
The Dauphinate of Murden
The Archipelagic Gem of Gemeinschaftsland
The Democratic Republic of Old Can
The Record-Scratchin' Robot of Sincluda
Latest Threads
