Lands EndBoard

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .916917918919920921922. . .1,0621,063»
LodgedFromMessages

via Augustin Alliance

The Eministrator of Emiline

New Trussia wrote:Kinda Yeah,
I wanted my Friend in real life to be a Lands End Member and be on the Map etc.
So we created the Holy Roman Union.
We were hanging out when I told him about it.
We created a password we both knew and a E-mail so he can be a WA but I accidently used my E-mail. So he then was a WA member and then a shareholder we filled the application so that he has land claims next to me and then after a few days I saw that I was banned from the wa. i tried contacted the moderators but they said I was still banned.

17 hours ago: Socialist Republic of Cantonia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Alsamivt was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Utopian Imperium was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Blains was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Bij1-land was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Moneylands was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: New Essendon was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: McInerney was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: First new Russian empire was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Xing ping was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: New Trussia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: The Holy Roman Union was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Socialist Peoples Democratic Republic was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Socialist Peoples Republc was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Struyriane was admitted to the World Assembly.
17 hours ago: Ordiests Frients was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Holan Rhiansordia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Zenity was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: East Vodane was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: JATKING was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: GODKINGDOMS was ejected from the WA for rule violations.

It honestly more looks like to me you were committing mass WA Multiing.



The Kingdom of New Trussia

Emiline wrote:17 hours ago: Socialist Republic of Cantonia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Alsamivt was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Utopian Imperium was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Blains was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Bij1-land was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Moneylands was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: New Essendon was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: McInerney was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: First new Russian empire was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Xing ping was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: New Trussia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: The Holy Roman Union was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Socialist Peoples Democratic Republic was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Socialist Peoples Republc was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Struyriane was admitted to the World Assembly.
17 hours ago: Ordiests Frients was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Holan Rhiansordia was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: Zenity was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: East Vodane was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: JATKING was ejected from the WA for rule violations.
17 hours ago: GODKINGDOMS was ejected from the WA for rule violations.

It honestly more looks like to me you were committing mass WA Multiing.

1. How Many Accounts are those!?
2. I only have 5 Accounts in NS
- New Trussia
- The Great German Monarch
- The Prussian Republic
- Jubria (I gave it to a friend of mine)
- The Holy Roman Union (friends account I made for them)
3. They said I was banned because ''multiple WA nations from the same device are not permitted'' because I logged into my Friends Account who was a WA member on the same device I am using for New Trussia not because I was mass WA Multiing

Earthern alliance



The Union of TESDAI

New Trussia wrote:I logged into my Friends Account who was a WA member on the same device I am using for New Trussia not because I was mass WA Multiing

They have no way to tell the difference there and it's pretty plainly stated in the FAQ that it's not a good idea.

---
I only have one WA nation but my brother has one and he sometimes uses this computer.
Unfortunately that's asking for trouble. We try to identify WA cheats accurately, but we have no way of telling exactly whose fingers are touching the keyboard at any given time. So unfortunately if you don't want to run the risk of being ejected from the WA (or worse), you shouldn't let anyone else operate WA nations from your computer, either.

Sharing a network or IP address is usually fine. The game does not rely on any single method of identifying WA cheats, but combines data from many different methods to calculate the likelihood that multiple WA nations are operated by the same person.
page=faq#WA

---
Also, hate to see you go, but we do have precedent around here to eject nations that break WA rules unless we know them personally and know 100% that is was a mistake. Sadly, none of the officials know you that well.
edit: Hate to see your friend go too

The Hallowed Queendom of Aeraven

What kind of options trigger black market and is it possible to have 0% black market in your nation?

Earthern alliance and Schabinur

Show

Post by Aeraven suppressed by Artevenia.

The Republic of Artevenia

I must notify you not to double-post. If you need to add more to your post, edit it.

The Եադյրա՟դյշի Պևօդշօդեվա՟դա of Deims Kir

Aeraven wrote:Is it possible to get stats on the daily frequency at which nations CTE from here, are banned/ejected/, and join LE?

I'm sure the API has some data about this, but I'm not knowledgeable in that area of NS

Rasumplia

Hello folks. I decided to stop playing NS. I wasnt quite an active member anyways, so I doubt that anyone would spot my it if I weren't to write it in this post.

Although I know nearly nothing about you, you seemed as a nice, quiet community. I am in awe to see how much effort some of you put in roleplaying.

I am leaving this game/site mainly because I don't find it amusing to me anymore, which is nobody's fault. Don't feel sad, perhaps I might meet some of you on Internet again, who knows?

Anyways, my tea is now running colder, it's time to go. I hope that you will enjoy your time here, have a nice rest of existence. Goodbye!

Rasumplia

Sacara, The federation of spokane, Deims Kir, Hooseria Magna, and 10 othersAntarctican Immagrants, Aeraven, Biggonian Megaist Empire, The Tribia, Earthern alliance, Chocolatistan, Authoritism, Schabinur, Pantsville, and United peoples of flowers

The Commonwealth of Biggonian Megaist Empire

Free Biggonian News
20/06/2022

Malwineville massacre shocks Biggonia
Humiliation for both sides today, as some of the first Commonwealth forces entered the actual administrative area of Shurdorf, marking a major humiliation for regent Jakob Premmel, who claimed the enemy would be defeated long before they set foot in the city. That being said, the units from the NLA which entered the area were quickly driven back by a counterattack from armoured and mechanised units from the Biggonian Empire.

However, this quickly turned into a PR disaster for both sides, as the Commonwealth's NLA troops withdrew to the town of Malwineville, many of the troops, who had been fed up with the constant fighting for the past few weeks, snapped and began looting and massacring the civilian inhabitants who had not already fled. Despite an attempted cover up, the story was quickly revealed within a few hours, and Empress Ricardina herself made a public apology and stated that the perpetrators have been punished. However, the Biggonian Empire has countered this by saying that there is no evidence of the perpetrators being punished.

The inability of Jakob Premmel to defend both his people and prevent enemy soldiers from setting foot into the capital of Grenzland has damaged his credibility, and people's morale in his military ability. However, observers believe that the fiercest fighting is yet to come, inside the city itself. Grenzland and the Biggonian Empire have kept many of their most well-trained troops in reserve, and it is clear the fight is not over yet.

The Communist Campus of Chocolatistan

Rasumplia wrote:Hello folks. I decided to stop playing NS. I wasnt quite an active member anyways, so I doubt that anyone would spot my it if I weren't to write it in this post.

Although I know nearly nothing about you, you seemed as a nice, quiet community. I am in awe to see how much effort some of you put in roleplaying.

I am leaving this game/site mainly because I don't find it amusing to me anymore, which is nobody's fault. Don't feel sad, perhaps I might meet some of you on Internet again, who knows?

Anyways, my tea is now running colder, it's time to go. I hope that you will enjoy your time here, have a nice rest of existence. Goodbye!

Rasumplia

I spot you on the leaderboards:) Anyways, have a good time, and feel free to visit us whenever you want.

Aeraven, Earthern alliance, and Schabinur



3 islands of the east pacific

sorry about inactivity is the reason i left. i am sorry.
i suddenly lost intrest in nationstates.

Earthern alliance, Chocolatistan, and Schabinur



The Confraternition of Hooseria Magna

Rasumplia wrote:~snip~

Sorry to see you go. If you ever come back, there will always be a place in Lands End for you!

3 islands of the east pacific wrote:sorry about inactivity is the reason i left. i am sorry.
i suddenly lost intrest in nationstates.

We are glad to see you back. I would suggest joining our discord (https://discord.gg/rNY5vcJ) as most of the region’s activity happens there!

Antarctican Immagrants, Biggonian Megaist Empire, The Tribia, Earthern alliance, and 3 othersChocolatistan, 3 islands of the east pacific, and Schabinur

Nation of orchid

[quote=tesdai;47805491]As Spokane’s links say, SuperStraight is a movement/sexuality that completely excludes trans people from hetero attraction. It doesn’t matter what their genitals are, it excludes them. This “others” trans people, which is transphobic.

There’s nothing wrong with being hetero/straight, but identifying as “straight but not with trans people” is saying that trans people aren’t actually the gender they are. There’s also nothing wrong with genital preference, but we don’t have sexualities based around whether people are white or black, so we shouldn’t have sexualities based solely around someone’s genitals. When you put it like that, I think it’s a little more obvious how kinda gross the whole idea is. (Unless you are someone who’s attraction is based on genitals… which is kinda gross ngl).

Thank you very much for saying all this so eloquently. I'm married but I'm kind grateful for the fact that I'm not generally sexually attracted to men. Since there seems to be a widespread idea amongst some cismen that calling them transphobic because they would refuse to date me or other transwomen is virtue signaling.

Earthern alliance and Chocolatistan

Voidborneempire

Hell nah.
I expect a partner that can live at least as long as I can,
is at least as physically healthy as I am,
and capable of having children with me.
I want my children to have the good looks of both me and my partner.
When science advances enough to ensure that, then I shall change my dating preferences.
And until folks stop telling me and like minded folks who we should be with I'll continue being evil for the sake of evil.
I may be young now, but I can not wait forever.
I consider anyone that stands in the way of either my dating preferences or the research I support an enemy whether they be Christians that think their bodies are magically perfect static unchanging things made in God's image or black and white thinking LGBTQ+ fanatics.

Earthern alliance and Chocolatistan



The Communist Campus of Chocolatistan

Nation of orchid wrote: [...] but we don’t have sexualities based around whether people are white or black, so we shouldn’t have sexualities based solely around someone’s genitals.

This is a false equivalence; that we don't have sexualities based around skin colour doesn't mean we shouldn't have sexualities based around someone's genitals. Skin colour is a very different thing from genitals, and don't even serve the same purpose. Genitals are called 'sex' organs for a reason.

Also, you can find people of certain skin colour to be more sexually attractive than other, which can be part of one's sexuality if defined as "a person's sexual feelings".

Hooseria Magna, Earthern alliance, Schabinur, and Voidborneempire



Nation of orchid

Chocolatistan wrote:This is a false equivalence; that we don't have sexualities based around skin colour doesn't mean we shouldn't have sexualities based around someone's genitals. Skin colour is a very different thing from genitals, and don't even serve the same purpose. Genitals are called 'sex' organs for a reason.

Also, you can find people of certain skin colour to be more sexually attractive than other, which can be part of one's sexuality if defined as "a person's sexual feelings".

If someone is going to base their sexual attraction on genitalia, then you're going to necessarily be attracted to more than just people who identify as women. Which is cool, there's theories that exist that say everyone is a little bi-sexual, or actually pansexual
I suppose because not everyone identifies as male or female. Secondly, if someone is necessarily sexually attracted to someone more based on their ethnic group and amount of melanin in the skin, that tip toes along the line of fetishizing other ethnic groups. And probably in some cases, crosses it. And on the flip side, it you're White European or White American, and you're sexually attracted to other White people over other ethnic groups, imho, that's pretty dangerous territory as well. Lastly, I think that one thing that's being ignored from this conversation is romantic orientation, which is separate but related to sexual orientation.

Earthern alliance and Chocolatistan



The Communist Campus of Chocolatistan

Nation of orchid wrote:If someone is going to base their sexual attraction on genitalia, then you're going to necessarily be attracted to more than just people who identify as women. Which is cool, there's theories that exist that say everyone is a little bi-sexual, or actually pansexual
I suppose because not everyone identifies as male or female.

I was pointing out the false equivalence you made when comparing attraction based on someone's skin colour to attraction based someone's genitalia when defending your claim that we shouldn't base sexuality solely around the latter. If someone is attracted to someone's genitalia (or 'biological sex'), then yes, a person can of course also be sexually attracted to bi- and homosexual females and trans persons (if they have female genitalia) if they're attracted to heterosexual females otherwise. Concerning your point that everyone is bi/pansexual to some extend according to some theories: according to my knowledge, it's consensus among scientists that humans evolved in multi-male/multi-female mating systems, a bit like present day bonobos (which are universally bisexual), with sex having important social functions. That theory would explain both physical (e.g. the very large and uniquely shaped human penis) as well as behavioural ("moral degeneracy") oddities observed among humans.

Nation of orchid wrote:Secondly, if someone is necessarily sexually attracted to someone more based on their ethnic group and amount of melanin in the skin, that tip toes along the line of fetishizing other ethnic groups. And probably in some cases, crosses it. And on the flip side, it you're White European or White American, and you're sexually attracted to other White people over other ethnic groups, imho, that's pretty dangerous territory as well.

I didn't say someone has to necessarily be more attracted to people of a certain ethnic group and skin pigmentation, but it can very well be the case. Skin colour is actually quite an important factor in determining someone's sexual attractiveness (e.g. doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0350), but you can of course argue how healthy it is for a society when a a specific distinction on "race" is made. I think someone should be free to feel attracted to whoever they like, but it can breed segregation (literally), and could cause substantial problems when taken broader than "I do(n't) think you're hot".

Nation of orchid wrote:I think that one thing that's being ignored from this conversation is romantic orientation, which is separate but related to sexual orientation.

Yes, it is.

Nation of orchid, you deleted a message, feel free to speak aloud, I realise the tone of my message might have become a bit more agressive than intended.

Hooseria Magna, Earthern alliance, and Schabinur

Post self-deleted by Nation of orchid.

Nation of orchid

Chocolatistan wrote:I was pointing out the false equivalence you made when comparing attraction based on someone's skin colour to attraction based someone's genitalia when defending your claim that we shouldn't base sexuality solely around the latter. If someone is attracted to someone's genitalia (or 'biological sex'), then yes, a person can of course also be sexually attracted to bi- and homosexual females and trans persons (if they have female genitalia) if they're attracted to heterosexual females otherwise. Concerning your point that everyone is bi/pansexual to some extend according to some theories: according to my knowledge, it's consensus among scientists that humans evolved in multi-male/multi-female mating systems, a bit like present day bonobos (which are universally bisexual), with sex having important social functions. That theory would explain both physical (e.g. the very large and uniquely shaped human penis) as well as behavioural ("moral degeneracy") oddities observed among humans.
I didn't say someone has to necessarily be more attracted to people of a certain ethnic group and skin pigmentation, but it can very well be the case. Skin colour is actually quite an important factor in determining someone's sexual attractiveness (e.g. doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0350), but you can of course argue how healthy it is for a society when a a specific distinction on "race" is made. I think someone should be free to feel attracted to whoever they like, but it can breed segregation (literally), and could cause substantial problems when taken broader than "I do(n't) think you're hot".
Yes, it is.

Nation of orchid, you deleted a message, feel free to speak aloud, I realise the tone of my message might have become a bit more agressive that intended.

I apologize for not making it more clear, but 3/4 of my message was quoting Tesdai, including the part about people being attracted to people based on their being black and white and all that. However, I can only speak on my lived experience with cisgender people based on when my marriage was briefly open. And with cisgender men, they fell into two broad categories, they thought I was attracted as a woman. But once I told them I was pre-op, because gender confirmation is very expensive, even if you have health insurance, they either stopped talking to me. Or they wanted me to be their experiment. And what a lot of cisgender people don't get, is that as a transwoman, I have a lot of the same struggles as cisgender women do, because the US is still largely Patriarchal. So even though I personally am rarely attracted to men, part of me still feels the need to be validated and told I'm pretty by cisgender men. And to be oversexualized by men, and maybe even some women because of my genitalia feels really gross to me. Especially because I've been assaulted multiple times by both men and women. I'm sorry for oversharing, I just wanted to bring a little bit of my background that I feel is relevant. And I'm also sorry if it seems like I'm trying to garner sympathy.

Earthern alliance and Chocolatistan

Show

Post by Nation of orchid suppressed by Hooseria Magna.

The Hallowed Queendom of Aeraven

Hello to all, officers and residents, I have decided to leave Lands End and start anew somewhere else. Thank you for your kindness and having me, I truly appreciate it; but perhaps this is not the place for me. I have forever been on the search for a region I feel like I belong in, and unfortunately the search continues. I wish everyone here the very best of luck in their individual and regional endeavors. Warm regards, Aeraven.

Deims Kir, The Tribia, Awesometonia, and Schabinur

Post self-deleted by The Tribia.

3 islands of the east pacific

why are people talking about genitals

The Free Federation of Schabinur

3 islands of the east pacific wrote:why are people talking about genitals

Who doesn't like genitals?

The Vabasian Fed State of Antarctican Immagrants

Voidborneempire wrote:

and capable of having children with me

I'm pretty sure children really shouldn't be your goal in a relationship

Nation of orchid and Schabinur

«12. . .916917918919920921922. . .1,0621,063»