The Rejected RealmsBoard

Taurifederation wrote:

Eastern Europeans are not solely famous for their swearing and cursing. But it is far better to swear, than to keep it inside you and then massacre tens of people with assault riffle. Don't you agree? Better to be rude than to be insane sociopath.
Bullying here ends with chair in the head. Not mass shootings, btw.

Fists and bloody noses here. There was a shooting incident in one of our schools, but it wasn't a mass shooting, kid found a gun in an abandoned house.

Hello Boiss!

Furry ssr wrote:

Hello Boiss!

Hello!

Personally, the n-word just has such a fire 'round it because everyone keeps giving a crap. It's cold as ice to say but you gotta just learn to let words wash off you like water on glass. When words stop having effect on you and you stop giving people reactions, they tend to piss off or try to find another way to bother you in which case you just keep learning how to stop feeding trolls.

Also, on the topic of those words, the g one is pretty hilarious because it's just a butchered way of saying crap in Vietnamese, lul.

Tumorya wrote:

This man has a putin bodypillow.

I just live in Russia and I have the Internet to go to the official website of our Duma where all projects are legally taken out.

Minskiev wrote:

That wasn't directed to Eastern Europeans. Anyone on the Internet could be a white supremacist because I don't know them well enough, or I don't know what they look like, or I don't know their intentions or viewpoint. My point is, it's not that individual people are. It's that on the Internet, these people do exist, and we cannot assume that everyone is doing something in good-faith, with honest, non-malicious intentions.

Can we fire Minsk for being a white supremacist with malicious intentions?

Aandruzognivia wrote:

Can we fire Minsk for being a white supremacist with malicious intentions?

I thought he was a prisoner here.

The church of satan wrote:

Not so sure I'd include BLM in that. It ended up being a scam so their founders could steal donations. They're just the most recent Enron. :-/

Oh, why am I not surprised?

Aandruzognivia wrote:

Oh, why am I not surprised?

Well, it wasn't expected, but I wasn't surprised either. Turns out they were just as crappy as the rest of us, and it took a couple of mansions to make it clear to everyone. :-/

crappy f***ing TRR history,anyways.
name 3 nations from 2021 TRR.
and i rediscovered this game
guess which nation.
TRR still the same.

Haii btches ya best clown is ill todayy :<

poll answer: pilipino.

Benetlemon wrote:

crappy f***ing TRR history,anyways.
name 3 nations from 2021 TRR.
and i rediscovered this game
guess which nation.
TRR still the same.

I'd be surprised if you actually knew our region's history. :P

Greater Somoiland wrote:

Am I the only one here who feels like the world needs less sexual and gender identifies and stuff. Like honestly I just saw pomosexual, polysexual, polygender, omnisexual, queer, xenogender, too much for me to comprehend

I understand you're struggling with that, but simply not everyone is the same.
Although I could agree with that sexuality just doesn't exist. I say, you could fall for anyone.
Most of the terms are relatively simple, and you could always ask someone to explain what they mean. That doesn't hurt, right?

hello

Belgua wrote:

hello

How are u

Russoamerican union wrote:

How are u

Mostly good

Wanna join here? There is a lot fascist and Nazism and communists.... maybe its only me? But anyway if your good and thats good!

The vast abyss wrote:

I understand you're struggling with that, but simply not everyone is the same.
Although I could agree with that sexuality just doesn't exist. I say, you could fall for anyone.
Most of the terms are relatively simple, and you could always ask someone to explain what they mean. That doesn't hurt, right?

It just humans do! Well if they got a little excited? It will be sexual or just for fun but.... the problem is humans they will have a sexual excitement and thats the problem! Well we will struggle for that.... a lot!

Hobbubobbia wrote:

While I don't want to cause you or any of the other RO's undue stress, I feel that suppressing any mention of what you deem to be "annoying stupid things" regardless of whether they're breaking the rules or not isn't the right course of action

It’s *literally* the N-word. And it *does* break the NS site rules. So stop talking about it

Oh no New Webster ceased to exist

Minskiev wrote:

It’s *literally* the N-word. And it *does* break the NS site rules. So stop talking about it

This debate is still open?

The vast abyss wrote:

I understand you're struggling with that, but simply not everyone is the same.
Although I could agree with that sexuality just doesn't exist. I say, you could fall for anyone.
Most of the terms are relatively simple, and you could always ask someone to explain what they mean. That doesn't hurt, right?

No, issue in another.
Why are such identities even necessary?
There is no identity of black-haired or, for example, green-eyed.