No I'm not. Everything I've said applies to the main branches of Christianity at least up until the past few centuries. It is fair to criticise religion seeing how much it has strained history. There are religions of every kind that have combat priests that bless the soldiers and tools of war. Major religions keep changing their doctrine to suit their needs, as the pope endorsed homosexuality while it being scorned by Catholicism and all other forms of Christianity for centuries, leading to many adherents to denounce him. Does this seem like a force of peace and unity to you?
Volaworand, The sakhalinsk empire, Melicorium, and Pagrosse
Rabbitz
So you are not going to give the Pope any merit in trying to fundamentally change the ideals of the Church that have stood there for more than two millennia?
The sakhalinsk empire, Melicorium, and Pagrosse
Ipugao
I don't know what's happening here, but I'll give my 2 cents. If your atheist, that's fine. If your religious, that's also fine. Just don't harm anyone and your fine in my book.
That is just applying former beliefs to science erroneously. The church invented intolerance, as pagans as they were called were much more open when it came to many things.
No. It is a dishonest move. The Bible doesn't change its contents according to popular opinion.
But hey, he and everyone else are free to believe whatever they want. Forcing your beliefs on others is the problem.
It’s fair to criticize that, but don’t apply that to modern religion. The US, for example, permitted and encouraged slavery. Does that mean that the modern US is the kind of country that would allow such a horrible thing to exist today? Just because it has bad things happening in its history doesn’t mean it’s automatically bad.
Talking about me are you? (I just joshing, I know you're talking about the real thing :P)
You are forgetting the part where pagans used christians as lion food because they refused to fight for Rome. Intolerance was not made by the church, only expanded upon by the minds of men.
1a. Intolerance has nothing to do with it. These people skewed facts for their own game knowing full well that it violated the doctrines of Christianity. 1b. Then if scientific books changed, they would be considered dishonest? Does changing the contents of something according to newfound ideals suddenly make it dishonest and unworthy to behold? Isn't the whole point of change to replace and add on new things as old practices and facts are discarded?
Amerion as the last bastion of sanity. I humbly beseech you not to follow the sinful ways of the regional flags especially from the North Pacific and East Pacific.
Quite unlikely. If you do win, which is highly unlikely, you could have a clear path to the Delegacy, which is highly unlikely. If you do win, which is highly unlikely, I highly unlikely doubt that you would be fit for the Delegacy - highly unlikely. I don't think, highly unlikely, that you would highly unlikely like the hihgliky aunlikeyl afadf;ayhdhs
The Floofy Foxes of The Solar System Scope
The Empire of Comfed
The Kingdom of Republic of Vareshia
The Riyacea of Uvalor
The Holy Ecclesiarch of Saint Cinder
The フェデレーション of Nowa Europa
The Mighty Foundation of Concrete Slab
The Penguinite Kleptocracy of Volaworand
The Revolutionary homeland of Orpzis
The Tastiest Parts of Beepee
The Fourth Republic of Taigama
Latest Threads
