The South PacificBoard

Tzertoria wrote:

Gay people silencing Chad

Is that supposed to be an insult?

New American Dictatorship wrote:

Hrmm, doesn't sound like that imho

Ambiguous.

Lemueria wrote:

Ambiguous.

Not really, you outright stated that you believe no endocaps to be better in your opinion

New American Dictatorship wrote:

Not really, you outright stated that you believe no endocaps to be better in your opinion

No endocaps is very synonymous with what I meant by better endocaps.

Lemueria wrote:

No endocaps is very synonymous with what I meant by better endocaps.

Then for all intents and purposes you are advocating for no endocaps, because you want them so restricted that they barely even exist

I love this game

Is it possible to repeal the first resolution
If people where to go for it

Tzertoria wrote:

Gay people silencing Chad

Chad the country...? or what

New American Dictatorship wrote:

Then for all intents and purposes you are advocating for no endocaps, because you want them so restricted that they barely even exist

Then be it.

Ammmericaaaa wrote:

Search up Ogtha guy.

The name sounds weird so no

Lemueria wrote:

Guys I was arguing for better endocaps, not for removal of endocaps.

Lemueria wrote:

No endocaps is very synonymous with what I meant by better endocaps.

synonymous “alike in meaning or significance” ref: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synonymous

So clearly in the first post you are advocating for no endo cap.