The Socialist States of Upper CanadaBoard

Jacobopolus wrote:

Cansatopia Ter cas zcazca nad nurney.

This is just unnecessary. May I ask where this came from?

Cansatopia wrote:

This is just unnecessary. May I ask where this came from?

I mean the opposite.

What, Im confused.

Cansatopia wrote:

What, Im confused.

I said you are stupid and ugly.

I know that.

But I meant the opposite

Jacobopolus wrote:

Jacobopolus state flags: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RSqWGHQPdsT6FxME4iJuLiC6JTdRL15WL_9w6tJAZLs/edit?usp=sharing

Which one is your favourite?

the second to last one

Nice

Thank you

Έ´ ˆ˜ Å ÓØ„Ò ¨ ÏˆÒˇÓˆÇӠŘˆÂÅÒ

Hint: Ve raspaza k've qastaza caz angala.

the 11th one is the best by far

Aza manhoi :)

Bitches be Bitching

vervazma

It is with great tragedy today that we mourn the death of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, beloved Husband to Her Majesty, the Queen of Jacobopolus. His sacrifice for his Kingdom and ours will always be remembered.

C'est avec une grande tragédie aujourd'hui que nous pleurons la mort du prince Philip, duc d'Édimbourg, époux bien-aimé de Sa Majesté, la reine de Jacobopolus. Son sacrifice pour son Royaume et le nôtre restera toujours dans les mémoires.

É com grande tragédia que lamentamos a morte do Príncipe Philip, Duque de Edimburgo, amado Marido de Sua Majestade, a Rainha de Jacobopolus. Seu sacrifício por seu Reino e o nosso será sempre lembrado.

Ser caz atoi zurqa taluney zes daea qat qer perho ve morta eva Prinze Philip, Duke ez'Edinburho, zelan marzo k'Ela Mazuestey, Ve Queva eza Jacobopolus (∆akøßøπølu¬). Elo ziquaje vur elo Kygo nad qeur caza suvienzo eterna.

no one cares

monarchy is an outdated institution

Boleynya wrote:

monarchy is an outdated institution

That is kinda disrespectful. The man just died, he has not just impacted one country but the world. And you are spitting on his greatest achievement and his pride. You may as well just have spit on his grave.
Disrespectful.

Cansatopia wrote:

That is kinda disrespectful. The man just died, he has not just impacted one country but the world. And you are spitting on his greatest achievement and his pride. You may as well just have spit on his grave.
Disrespectful.

A man died at 99, after living an incredibly privileged life, made possible by exploitation through colonialism and the class system. While I sympathize with the family that lost a father, grandfather, husband, etc..., I think the attention given to the royals, and the ceremony, is unearned. The monarchy is an outdated institution that I do not wish to support, as it represents everything I stand against. The fact that his death "impacts" the world is sad reminder of imperialism and colonialism, which shouldn't be commended. If I sat at the head of an institution, by right of marriage and birth, that pillaged the Global South and preserved class inequality, then I wouldn't consider that an achievement, let alone my "greatest achievement and pride". But alas, everyone is too caught up in the pomp and ceremony and vague adherence to "tradition" to notice the underlying problems.

Boleynya wrote:

A man died at 99, after living an incredibly privileged life, made possible by exploitation through colonialism and the class system. While I sympathize with the family that lost a father, grandfather, husband, etc..., I think the attention given to the royals, and the ceremony, is unearned. The monarchy is an outdated institution that I do not wish to support, as it represents everything I stand against. The fact that his death "impacts" the world is sad reminder of imperialism and colonialism, which shouldn't be commended. If I sat at the head of an institution, by right of marriage and birth, that pillaged the Global South and preserved class inequality, then I wouldn't consider that an achievement, let alone my "greatest achievement and pride". But alas, everyone is too caught up in the pomp and ceremony and vague adherence to "tradition" to notice the underlying problems.

Actually, you are the only one tying him to the monarchy. His legacy is so much more than that, and he has affected the world in ways beyond his institution. However, you attempt to deny him his outstanding legacy by simply straining him to an institution he did not even wish to join. You are limiting all of his life accomplishments to a single institution he was a part of, of which he worked beyond that to achieve his accomplishments. Most of what he has done lies beyond his relation with the monarchy, and came as a result of his own personal work, something of course, you would not understand, as you have never had to work for anything in your life.

You also call him incredibly privileged, by exploitation through colonialism and the class system. Is it a privilege to be banished from your homeland when you are only an infant? Forced to rebuild your life outside of your native nation? In fact, you are without a doubt more privileged than he ever was, free to complain about others' great achievements without having any of your own. He was a loyal officer of the Royal Navy throughout all of World War II, something that should always be respected, especially fighting for a country that is not even your home. The fact that you will likely never have to enter combat makes you the incredibly privileged one, and yet you still sit here and undermine his bravery and courage he has displayed.

Prince Philip had absolutely nothing to do with colonialism, and was born a while after the end of the colonial era. Being born into the Danish and Greek Royal families makes it so he in fact has no benefit off of colonialism, as these Kingdoms had not profited off of people working in another land. And if you insist the actions of his ancestors have anything to do with him, then you also live a privileged life, made possible by exploitation through colonialism and the class system, and we shall dishonour your life when you pass. The death of Prince Philip caused no commendation of imperialism and colonialism, something which he had absolutely nothing to do with. His accomplishments reach far beyond the realm of the monarchy, including participation in philanthropic projects, activism for environmental issues, foundation of the Duke of Edinburgh Award, and so much more.

Most importantly, he was the loyal and beloved husband of the Queen, helping to modernize the Royal Family and acknowledge the "underlying problems" that you speak of. But alas, Prince Philip was an honourable man, whose legacy extends far beyond the monarchy, and therefore, it is regrettable that there are people like you who tie his entire life and unique identity to a single institution and role which he did not choose to be a part of. He has changed the world in more ways you can possibly imagine, and we should forever be respectful of that.

Boleynya wrote:

A man died at 99, after living an incredibly privileged life, made possible by exploitation through colonialism and the class system. While I sympathize with the family that lost a father, grandfather, husband, etc..., I think the attention given to the royals, and the ceremony, is unearned. The monarchy is an outdated institution that I do not wish to support, as it represents everything I stand against. The fact that his death "impacts" the world is sad reminder of imperialism and colonialism, which shouldn't be commended. If I sat at the head of an institution, by right of marriage and birth, that pillaged the Global South and preserved class inequality, then I wouldn't consider that an achievement, let alone my "greatest achievement and pride". But alas, everyone is too caught up in the pomp and ceremony and vague adherence to "tradition" to notice the underlying problems.

I mean he was a famous person, and a role model to many people. Of course, his death would impact many people. I agree with what Jacob said but I cant be bothered to waste my time telling someone who hates a person for where he was born. And he was sarcastic which I loved. Interestingly, he was one of the oldest ww2 vets in the UK.

Jacobopolus wrote:

Actually, you are the only one tying him to the monarchy. His legacy is so much more than that, and he has affected the world in ways beyond his institution. However, you attempt to deny him his outstanding legacy by simply straining him to an institution he did not even wish to join. You are limiting all of his life accomplishments to a single institution he was a part of, of which he worked beyond that to achieve his accomplishments. Most of what he has done lies beyond his relation with the monarchy, and came as a result of his own personal work, something of course, you would not understand, as you have never had to work for anything in your life.

You also call him incredibly privileged, by exploitation through colonialism and the class system. Is it a privilege to be banished from your homeland when you are only an infant? Forced to rebuild your life outside of your native nation? In fact, you are without a doubt more privileged than he ever was, free to complain about others' great achievements without having any of your own. He was a loyal officer of the Royal Navy throughout all of World War II, something that should always be respected, especially fighting for a country that is not even your home. The fact that you will likely never have to enter combat makes you the incredibly privileged one, and yet you still sit here and undermine his bravery and courage he has displayed.

Prince Philip had absolutely nothing to do with colonialism, and was born a while after the end of the colonial era. Being born into the Danish and Greek Royal families makes it so he in fact has no benefit off of colonialism, as these Kingdoms had not profited off of people working in another land. And if you insist the actions of his ancestors have anything to do with him, then you also live a privileged life, made possible by exploitation through colonialism and the class system, and we shall dishonour your life when you pass. The death of Prince Philip caused no commendation of imperialism and colonialism, something which he had absolutely nothing to do with. His accomplishments reach far beyond the realm of the monarchy, including participation in philanthropic projects, activism for environmental issues, foundation of the Duke of Edinburgh Award, and so much more.

Most importantly, he was the loyal and beloved husband of the Queen, helping to modernize the Royal Family and acknowledge the "underlying problems" that you speak of. But alas, Prince Philip was an honourable man, whose legacy extends far beyond the monarchy, and therefore, it is regrettable that there are people like you who tie his entire life and unique identity to a single institution and role which he did not choose to be a part of. He has changed the world in more ways you can possibly imagine, and we should forever be respectful of that.

How well put. I love how you pointed out that he was not in fact British.