Lodged From Messages 19 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Krovx Belgium wrote: No, it is an amendment to a bill still in debate.And the amendment was made with less than a quarter of the debate period left.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Empire of Mira Hetonika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: I am still against Clause 1 of Article 3 of this bill as it places no time limits for the President and it’s giving more power to an already very powerful executive branch.The bill does not grant any new powers to the executive branch. Absolutely no change is made to the President’s role in the passing of legislation, it simply codifies the process currently used into law.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Mira Hetonika wrote: The bill does not grant any new powers to the executive branch. Absolutely no change is made to the President’s role in the passing of legislation, it simply codifies the process currently used into law.It does. Laws currently do not have to be signed into law by the President. This means that if a bill is passed in the assembly, then it is immediately law. Giving the President the ability to destroy any possible bills passing through the assembly by just not signing the bill forever , IS NOT A GOOD IDEA!
19 days ago via RGBN
The Empire of Mira Hetonika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: It does. Laws currently do not have to be signed into law by the President. This means that if a bill is passed in the assembly, then it is immediately law. Giving the President the ability to destroy any possible bills passing through the assembly by just not signing the bill forever , IS NOT A GOOD IDEA!The president only has a choice between signing a bill into law or vetoing it. If the Legislature believes the President is unduly delaying a choice between signing or vetoing section 4 of Article D can be implemented.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Mira Hetonika wrote: The president only has a choice between signing a bill into law or vetoing it. If the Legislature believes the President is unduly delaying a choice between signing or vetoing section 4 of Article D can be implemented.So, instead of fixing the bill, you’d rather have to impeach the president?
19 days ago via RGBN
The Empire of Mira Hetonika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: So, instead of fixing the bill, you’d rather have to impeach the president?I would rather choose to impeach the president if they do not perform their duties in a timely manner. Especially when the duty in question is saying yes or no to bills that pass in the RA.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Mira Hetonika wrote:RGBN Regional Bill 9: Proposal and Passage Restructure Act Purpose: To solidify and improve the process through which future regional bills are proposed and codified into law.
Be it enacted by the RGBN Regional Assembly that:
Article 1: Terminology
Article 1 Clauses Terms in this bill are defined as the following: Sponsor - the original writer and proposer of the bill Second - a statement expressing support for the bill being sent to debate and voting
Article 2: Proposal of Legislation
Article 2 Clauses i. Bills are to be proposed properly formatted on the Regional Assembly Message Board by the sponsor of the bill.
ii. Bills must be seconded by an assemblyperson other than the original sponsor to enter debate and voting.
iii. Following seconding, established process will ensue.
Article 3: Passing of Legislation
Article 3 Clauses i. Bills passed by the Regional Assembly will then be taken to the President to be signed into law or vetoed.
ii. The President or any Assemblyperson has the right at any time to call to question whether the bill at debate is constitutional. Upon the President or any Assemblyperson using this privilege, the speaker is to invite the Goldenfolk Tribunal on the assembly floor to give an opinion on whether the bill in question is constitutional if passed
iii. Should a bill be declared unconstitutional, it will fail on the spot regardless of if it has been passed in the assembly.
The changes defined here will go into effect immediately upon passage.
Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Nay.
19 days ago via RGBN
The Prophet's Land of Stewartika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Aye.
18 days ago via RGBN
The Rēspublica Ūnita of Lignuntia
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.
Aye.
18 days ago via RGBN
The Grozzer Theokratiske Reik of Krovx Belgium
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Aye.
18 days ago via RGBN
The Empire of Mira Hetonika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Aye
18 days ago via RGBN
The Community of Kent Valley
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Aye
18 days ago via RGBN
The Gallic Republic of Libertarian Union of Canada
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Aye.
18 days ago via RGBN
The Sic semper Imperium of Plaugetopia
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Assembly Members [nation]Krovx Belgium[/nation [nation]Suter[/nation [nation]Plaugetopia[/nation [nation]Katanunkerver[/nation [nation]Mylderm[/nation [nation]Reberydinigzadaland[/nation [nation]Lignuntia[/nation [nation]Nexcruzmas[/nation [nation]Libertarian Union of Canada[/nation [nation]Kent Valley[/nation [nation]Stewartika[/nation [nation]Colmaijo[/nation [nation]Monaru Kharands[/nation [nation]Elutherias[/nation [nation]Mira Hetonika[/nation
Aye.
16 days ago via RGBN
The Volks und Erzherzogtum Bund of Mylderm
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Debate has now ended. Voting will now start and last 3 days.
Respond to this message whether you vote Aye, Nay or Abstain to the bill currently on the Assembly floor.Abstain.
13 days ago Edited via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Mira Hetonika wrote:RGBN Regional Bill 9: Proposal and Passage Restructure Act Purpose: To solidify and improve the process through which future regional bills are proposed and codified into law.
Be it enacted by the RGBN Regional Assembly that:
Article 1: Terminology
Article 1 Clauses Terms in this bill are defined as the following: Sponsor - the original writer and proposer of the bill Second - a statement expressing support for the bill being sent to debate and voting
Article 2: Proposal of Legislation
Article 2 Clauses i. Bills are to be proposed properly formatted on the Regional Assembly Message Board by the sponsor of the bill.
ii. Bills must be seconded by an assemblyperson other than the original sponsor to enter debate and voting.
iii. Following seconding, established process will ensue.
Article 3: Passing of Legislation
Article 3 Clauses i. Bills passed by the Regional Assembly will then be taken to the President to be signed into law or vetoed.
ii. The President or any Assemblyperson has the right at any time to call to question whether the bill at debate is constitutional. Upon the President or any Assemblyperson using this privilege, the speaker is to invite the Goldenfolk Tribunal on the assembly floor to give an opinion on whether the bill in question is constitutional if passed
iii. Should a bill be declared unconstitutional, it will fail on the spot regardless of if it has been passed in the assembly.
The changes defined here will go into effect immediately upon passage.
Voting has ended. Tally Aye: 7 Nay: 1 Abstain: 1Bill has passed and is now law.
13 days ago Edited via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Krovx Belgium wrote: I second this.Which amendment exactly have you seconded, Mr. President?
13 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows:
Click to show... Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however, a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the Executive, Legislative, and Curatorial branches. 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
Read dispatch The above amendment to the Grand Constitution has been seconded. Debate will now start, and last three days.
Copy of Amendment Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows: Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are three two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
5.3 The third method of removing a tribune is via the Tribunes among themselves voting to remove the tribune in question. 5.3.1 If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the branches of Executive Legislative and Curatorial 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
13 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows:
Click to show... Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however, a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the Executive, Legislative, and Curatorial branches. 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
Read dispatch The above amendment to the Grand Constitution has been seconded. Debate will now start, and last three days.
Copy of Amendment Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows: Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are three two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
5.3 The third method of removing a tribune is via the Tribunes among themselves voting to remove the tribune in question. 5.3.1 If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the branches of Executive Legislative and Curatorial 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
This is a good amendment, however, I see no reason to add a third method to remove a tribune. Especially when this method could let the tribunal tear itself apart.
13 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: Voting has ended. Tally Aye: 7 Nay: 1 Abstain: 1Bill has passed and is now law.
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows:
Click to show... Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however, a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the Executive, Legislative, and Curatorial branches. 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
Read dispatch The above amendment to the Grand Constitution has been seconded. Debate will now start, and last three days.
Copy of Amendment Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows: Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are three two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
5.3 The third method of removing a tribune is via the Tribunes among themselves voting to remove the tribune in question. 5.3.1 If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the branches of Executive Legislative and Curatorial 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
New assemblymember, Sidervidaii is now notified of the recent happenings of the Assembly.
12 days ago Edited via RGBN
The Empire of Mira Hetonika
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: This is a good amendment, however, I see no reason to add a third method to remove a tribune. Especially when this method could let the tribunal tear itself apart.I agree with the Second Speaker in regards to amending methods of removing Tribunes. I would suggest striking all amendments to Section 5. Changes to Section 1 and addition of Section 6 all seem logical and necessary.
12 days ago via RGBN
The Community of Kent Valley
Reberydinigzadaland wrote:Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows:
Click to show... Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal.
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however, a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the Executive, Legislative, and Curatorial branches. 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
Read dispatch The above amendment to the Grand Constitution has been seconded. Debate will now start, and last three days.
Copy of Amendment Purpose: To layout the powers and duties of The Goldenfolk Tribunal
Article 1: Amendment I. The Amendment to Article J is as follows: Article J: The Judiciary Branch 1. The Judiciary Branch of the RGBN shall consist of a Tribunal, named The Goldenfolk Tribunal. , composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes. 1.1 The Tribunal must be composed of a minimum of 3 Tribunes, as with the number of Tribunes to remain an odd number. 1.2 The Tribunal is led by a Chief Tribune, which is appointed among the Tribunes. The Chief Tribune determines the rules and conduct of the Tribunes and Citizens interacting in and with The Goldenfolk Tribunal
2. The Tribunes shall be nominated by the President and confirmed by a simple majority vote in the Regional Assembly.
3. If there are less than 3 Tribunes, the President must nominate a citizen to the position within 2 weeks.
3.1. The Speaker of The Regional Assembly must start a debate on it within 1 week, the debate must not last more than 3 days, and whenever it ends, the Speaker of the Assembly shall start the voting at a maximum of 1 day after.
4. Tribunes serve until they resign, or are removed.
5. There are three two methods to remove of a Tribune; 5.1. The first method of removing a tribune is via a 2/3 majority vote in the Regional Assembly. 5.1.1. The President may veto this action, however a 3/4 majority vote in the Regional Assembly will overturn this veto. After this, the President shall not have the right to veto the removal.
5.2. The second method of removing a tribune is via a request from the President; After the President requests the removal of a tribune, the Regional Assembly only needs a simple majority vote to remove the requested Tribune. 5.2.1. If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the requested tribune.
5.3 The third method of removing a tribune is via the Tribunes among themselves voting to remove the tribune in question. 5.3.1 If this method is used, the President may not veto the removal of the tribune.
6. The Goldenfolk Tribunal's powers and duties: 6.1 Judicial review on the constitutionality of the actions from the branches of Executive Legislative and Curatorial 6.2 Judge and provide verdicts and if needed punishment in Court Cases involving the breaking of law.
Mira Hetonika wrote: I agree with the Second Speaker in regards to amending methods of removing Tribunes. I would suggest striking all amendments to Section 5. Changes to Section 1 and addition of Section 6 all seem logical and necessary.
Reberydinigzadaland wrote: This is a good amendment, however, I see no reason to add a third method to remove a tribune. Especially when this method could let the tribunal tear itself apart. I made this amendment to be a opening for the assembly to take a second swing at amending article J. I just made a few suggestions to get the ball rolling.
12 days ago via RGBN
The Центральна Республика of Reberydinigzadaland
Kent Valley wrote: I made this amendment to be a opening for the assembly to take a second swing at amending article J. I just made a few suggestions to get the ball rolling.I'm kind of obligated to put them through the process anyways because they were seconded. However, I'm sure Krovx would accept your request if you were to ask him to 'unsecond' the other amendment (The one which hasn't yet entered debate) in your post.
11 days ago Edited via RGBN
The Grozzer Theokratiske Reik of Krovx Belgium
Kent Valley wrote: I made this amendment to be a opening for the assembly to take a second swing at amending article J. I just made a few suggestions to get the ball rolling.I see. They are generally good suggestions in my opinion that I think would be beneficial to the law. Perhaps a general topic of debate could be more fitting instead of a full legislative process would be fitting so the Assembly can explore this topic.