COMMIES ARE RADICALIST SOCIALISTS NOT ALL SOCIALISTS ARE LIKE THAT USSR AND CHINA ARE D!CKS THEY KILLED SO MANY PEOPLE THEY WERE COMMIES ČSSR WASN'T COMMUNIST DURING THE RULE OF ANTHONY NOVOTN› AND ALEXANDER DUBČEK, IT WAS SOCIALIST, BUT THEN RUSSIANS CAME AND WERE LIKE: "No, u too free" AND THEN INVADED US! (it was called the Prague Spring [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_Spring])
Nobody was, and nobody is, a true Communist. Communism, and to major extent even Socialism, is practically impossible to realise in the orthodox way as described by Marx. Nobody ever held true to the Communist manifesto and most people were only inspired by it and what they practiced was a subgroup of Communism/Socialism (e.g. Stalinism, Marxism-Leninism, Neo-Marxism, Socialism with human face...) altered in a certain way in hopes to make Marx's thoughts more fiesable in practice. I disagree with all of them. Yes, Dubček was way better than Stalin, yes, Hoxha was more orthodox than Neo-Marxists but I wouldn't like to live in a country run by either of them. I would only ever chose a form of Socialism if the other choice was a worse form of Socialism or Communism.
Sweden is higly free market society with a lot of tax. It's not socialist. Bernie Sanders is a liar. Sweden tried socialims at 80s, it failed. SWEDEN OR ANY SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRY IS NOT LEFTIST! THATS US MEDIA LIE!
Marx was commie. Communism has no state. Commies says, we will rule all state at first and kill all rich. THen we will creat anarchist society with ideas of materalism. AnCom don't suppor the idea of state in fisrt place. So for Marxist state is tool for anarchy. But for anarchist, state is enemy.
Socialist Countries: USSR: Destroyed half of its people China: Same but still alive thanks to capitalist economical plans Cuba: Same but lost its everything North Korea: Yu know Vietnam: Start civil war, US and USSR joined in and lasted for decade. It destroyed a lot of people. Laos: Destroyed a lot at coup, they are one of the most poorest nation now Zimbabwe: Destroyed a lot at civil war, they are one of the most poorest nation now Angola: Destroyed a lot at civil war but after war they stop being socialist because it didn't work 3rd Reich: Yu know Chile: Went into bankrupt in 1 year than went into civil war.
I can count more socialist countries. But communism never been achieved and will never be because it's utopian.
Again, Scandinavia never been communist o socialist. Nordic System is just capitalisms with more tax. For example, a car's tax is more than it's own prize at Denmark. The reason why this system works is, Scandinavians uses tax money good unlike USSR.
Unlike Socialism, Sweden has no: Collective ownership, cooperatives (JZDs or Kolkhozes), commune government (but they are pretty close), economic and industrial democracy, planned economy, equal opportunity (actually they've got it but limited), free association, sharing economy, social dividend, workers' self-management...
Ancap is true anarchy. Ancom = all freedom except economic freedom. Ancap = all freedom.
Ancap has big problem. Safety. NAP is not enough. Would work in little towns or US style planed city. But it wouldnt work in East-Euro countries. How can you protect you property when it's just one little apartment in whole old soviet building.
Welcome here First rome! So this guy is Eastern Tatarstan, he's slovak and is the leader of the region, you can call him Tatar after a while. This one's Calisto states, he's from US and is the space guy, you can call him callisto. These three are Kosovo-cyprus, Austro Danubia and Bithynia-Crimea, they had a RMB war for cyprus recently, you can call them KosCyp, Austro and Bithynia.
We recently had a discussion about socialism ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BTW Yanab killed Cidade Capitalista do Sul