Post

Thank you for giving me some context, I am pretty new and there is a lot of history here that I don't know.

But I can't help but think that the text of this repeal is based is based on petty grievances and technicalities to justify an anti-left wing stances. For example, in the original proposal says

"participating in the June 2014 destruction of NAZI EUROPE, an aggressive region that had previously been condemned by this august institution"

and the repeal says "The destruction of Nazi Europe was coordinated by Evil Wolf, the North Pacific Army, Lone Wolves United, and the United Imperial Armed Forces. While their commendation redirects credit to the Red Fleet, the Red Fleet didn't move in until the region had already been captured and secured, making them only a footnote in the operation"

Am I crazy, or does the justification for the repeal try to make it seem like The Red Fleet was given full credit for this operation, but in the text it just says that they participated in it. So for the one example I can kind of verify with text, makes me feel like this was a fake "got ya"

Isn't it enough to be consistently against Nazi's and fascists to be commended? I think so, that is why I am against this repeal.