No worries mate. Sarcasm is tricky to detect online. Yeah agree on Burnham. He's doing well as Mayor of Manchester. Hopefully he has genuinely shifted to the left and isn't simply taking advantage of the relatively straightforward regionalism.
The ballot box can certainly advance some rights and handouts to the working class. But I can't see a path to a Dictatorship of the Proletariat solely via voting. It would require a complete constitutional overhaul of any European country, which wouldn't be possible via normal electoral processes. Social Democracy is social imperialism at best.
Greatunion of soviet socialist republics, Sauros, Phinxia, Ardelan, and 4 othersThe Antarian Commonwealth, Europa volksdemokratisch sozialistisch, Socialist indian republics, and Lussr
Proletarska
Anyone would be interested in rp on sunday May 29 2022 due to me going on a trip for like most of my rest of my day
As Much As i Don't sympathize with the whole dictatorship of the proletariat thing, as in this part I'm more of a Luxembourgist than a leninist, I Still view Social democracy as a neccessary stage for countries with low influence over the others or have already developed Socialist-leaning Democracies. And, as Much As I Agree that the whole dictatorship of the proletariat has to do away with many many changes, Your dictatorship of the proletariat could be achieved via what I call "Democratic Totalism" Which basically is a democratic vote where a majority is supporting a Socialist or left-leaning project, so via this vote, which Will require a LOT of effort, it could still be possible. (Edit: Sorry for replying the next day, it was just like, 9 PM for me.)
Europa volksdemokratisch sozialistisch
Russian communist empire
yes, even though it is contradictory. Everyone will have their own opinion about everything.
Book: A Constitution for the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain Author: Beatrice Webb Year Published: 1920 Pages: 61-62 & 108-110 URL: https://archive.org/details/constitutionfors00passuoft/page/n3/mode/2up
It is an essential feature of the British Constitution that our sovereign king reigns but does not rule, and that he holds his title, not by any religious or metaphysical right, but by an Act of Parliament, which has been more than once amended and which, admittedly, can be repealed like any other statute; and thus, in effect, by the continued assent of the British people. In fact, the contract of service between the British king and the British people may be legally and rightfully terminated at any time by the will of either party; we cannot force any member of the Royal Family to serve us as king, any more than he can compel us to continue him in office as the first official of the State. And if we pass from the constitutional theory of the text-books to the facts as we see them to-day, what we have to note is that the particular function of the British monarch — his duty as king — is not the exercise of governmental power in any of its aspects, but something quite different, namely, the performance of a whole series of rites and ceremonies, which lend the charm of historic continuity. to the political institutions of the British race, and which go far, under present conditions, to maintain the bond of union between the races and creeds of the Commonwealth of Nations that still styles itself the British Empire. This function could not be fulfilled to the satisfaction of either king or people, unless the tie of mutual sentiment between citizen and sovereign remained real and vital. If ever this breaks, the institution of monarchy, in Britain or elsewhere, would almost automatically come to an end — we venture to think, by common consent of king and people.
Hello!My comraders!Now Derlian social Republic has helping in the Europeia comrader country,Morksla,how some country has prepare to invasion him,but our great government has stop him and sent some aids to him!