This long story starts from the day when my client Whole India arrived in the NS region India. He arrived during the Parliamentary elections so obviously he wasn't allowed to run in the elections. After, talking to the then delegate Hindu Puri, he was appointed as the Junior Home Minister while Neo Kerala was the then appointed Home Minister. Sadly, my client contacted the Southfield foreign Minister to confirm about the Duel Citizenship agreement which was said by a few people. When this news broke out a rumour was spread that Whole India is a black hawk agent, and another rumour named another nation who tried to rig WAD elections against Hindu Puri. With this all up, the Southfield's set up a trial against my client.
Whole India’s trail Southfield Safety and Security Ministry Defendant: Whole India Type: Criminal Indictment File NO: 122-19
Description of Charges:
Under indictment number 112-19 the listed defendant, Whole India, messaged Foreign Affairs Minister Valis, and Regional Affairs Minister Argau to discuss interregional politics, specifically relating to the issue of the Indian-Southfieldian Dual Citizenship Accords. India’s government has alleged in indictment 122-19 that Whole India has mentioned raiding The Black Hawks, requesting members of the Indian government to assist him in this regard.
Regional Advocates Witness list:
• Valis • Will claim that he got a telegram from Whole India requesting information on the Southfield-India Citizenship Agreement Argau • Will claim that he got the same telegram as Whole India requesting information on the citizenship agreement. Awell Islands (or puppet representative) • Will claim that Whole India was not authorized to inquire about such information, and conspired to raid Bharat.
Regional Advocate: Avezistan Defendant: Whole India Justice: Kalantis
Case No: 122-19 Date Filed: 08 November, 2019 Region Filed In: Southfield
Evidence in Defense
In this evidence see Hindu Puri's Statement "In order to give more and more members a chance I have appointed Whole India and Neo Kerala as Junior HM[Home Minister] and HM[Home Minister] respectively" So Your hon'r Kalantis this proves that my client Whole India was an appointed Junior Home Minister. You can view this statement on India's RMB page: 1,101.
In this evidence see New dilli agreed and my client Whole India was appointed as the Recruitment Minister of Bharat. So that proves that Whole India stayed in Bharat as Recruitment Minister. You can view it on Bharat's RMB page: 54.
In this Evidence we Can see that my client Whole Indiawas not banned from Bharat. You can view it on Bharat's Ban list.
In this Evidence you can see that Awell Islands himself agreed that HM[Home Minister] is the in charge of the Citizenship Form. So that's clear that my client Whole India just tried to know whether there was any such type of treaty and if it was then how could it fit the Indian Situation. You can view it on India's RMB page: 1,106
Later, the verdict was delivered against my client, but he was acquitted from the Black hawk agent charge. However, my client was banned from India. The original Southfield verdict asked some 6-month ban from Southfield while in India the term for this ban was not stated. On 14th, January 2020 my client was allowed to get in India. However, Awell Islands stated that if Whole India gets three strikes he will be banned again. And for criticizing the government He was given all three strikes. My client was banned and soon the ban was revoked, but that time's founder stated Whole India will not be an admin till 1st April 2021.
But my client has served more than the sentence his crime was and criticizing the govt isn't a crime. And for the same crime, the sentence cannot be increased. Hence, My client pledges he is not guilty for the same mistake as he cannot be dragged to the court many times.
Yes... But he has served administrative ban from 14 January 2020 till now... and we have seen the work he has done in Indian parliament... all that happened in past was due to just mere inexperience.. and if WI was allowed in India he should not be deprived of his right to participate in administration.