IndiaBoard

Aratartopia wrote:

India has a massive potential because:
1) We are pretty peaceful
2) Cheap Labour
3) Skilled Workforce
4) A large population
5) We are great for investments because we have an economy which is pretty stable and builds back extremely fast if disrupted
6) We have massive population of the extremely educated workforce, which results in many unicorns and start ups that help our economy immensely and it's just going to grow.
7) The Pharma industry is huge and I believe that it will keep growing because everyone needs medicine
8) India's schemes help businesses to have the confidence in investing in India and because of such schemes, these companies have a great experience in which they work in a country that's democratic, meaning no backlash from the west and they get the same type of employees like they did in China (Insert Trump hand motion)
I believe in 40 years, if we grow as we are growing today, India is ready to become a superpower and if we just focus on development we may become the next China or even the USA

We should also focus on improving our education system the ancient gurukul system was great ofc we cannot bring it back but We can use some of its points also your late to sleep like I am

Mithulla wrote:

We should also focus on improving our education system the ancient gurukul system was great ofc we cannot bring it back but We can use some of its points also your late to sleep like I am

Our current education system just destroys creativity and logical thinking of a student and makes a student a machine. That is all it does.

Novogaard wrote:

Hey, how is everyone over here in this region?

Not bad, how r u?

Indusse wrote:

Utter nonsense
Kumari Kandam is a legit theory, it's just Lemuria. The reason you find it as Dravidian Nationalist stuff is due to its Tamil influence and why there exists a Tamil influence? That's because the existence of the supercontinent was first mentioned in Tamil epic. Also these Sangam Literature ain't sh*t stuff but those which talk about the history of South India.

You sound like a Dravidian nationalist indeed.

It is not only false but utter bs from a scientific point of view which makes as much sense as Atlantis or Kailash being thousands of yojanas with jewel encrusted sides. It sounds very good on paper and stuff, but at the end of the day is merely mythology and not real stuff.

Dravidian nationalists often try to push the idea of Lemuria, in order to have a basis of distinct nationality.

Also, if we followed literature of everything, it would be stifling scientific theory.

The, so called, Kumari Kandam lies predominantly in the Indian Ocean. The tamil historians claim the Kumari Kandam was submerged under water due to melting of the ice caps. Even if all the present day’s ice in the world melts, the sea level rises only by 216 feet(65.83 meters). The average depth of Indian Ocean is 12,990 feet(3,960 meters). Imagine the quantity of ice to be present at the poles in order to raise the sea level by almost 4 kilometers and submerge the Kumari Kandam.

Every one knows how the Himalayas are formed in the northern part of India. The Himalayas are formed due to the Continental Drift. The Indian, African, Australian and South American Plates drift towards the Northern American and Eurasian Plates and collide with them. The Indian plate on colliding with the Eurasian plate, formed the Himalayas. If this is the case, where did the Kumari Kandam come from?

As the average depth of Indian Ocean is 4 kms, the depth of the Kumari Kandam can be assumed to be close to 4 kms or even deeper. How can such a huge area of low lying land of Kumari Kandam can be formed amidst the high lying India, Africa and Australia?

Just don't spew Dravidian bs here. I take it with a pinch of salt.

Aratartopia wrote:

Yeah even in Hindu Scriptures which usually give accurate locations of Hindu places say the same. These scriptures were written thousands of years ago and the world would obviously be different back then. I don't think that Kumari Kandam was so big that it connected India to Australia and Madagascar, but there had to be land in the Indian ocean other than India.

…Who really knows, and who can swear,
How creation came, when or where!
Even gods came after creation’s day,
Who really knows, who can truly say

When and how did creation start?
Did He do it? Or did He not?
Only He, up there, knows, maybe;
Or perhaps, not even He.
[Rigveda X: 129]

Science is ever changing in hinduism, and we are not a religion of the book. Staying close to science has made our religion Sanatana, or we would be left in the dust like other polytheist religions

Hindu Ram Rajya wrote:

You sound like a Dravidian nationalist indeed.

It is not only false but utter bs from a scientific point of view which makes as much sense as Atlantis or Kailash being thousands of yojanas with jewel encrusted sides. It sounds very good on paper and stuff, but at the end of the day is merely mythology and not real stuff.

Dravidian nationalists often try to push the idea of Lemuria, in order to have a basis of distinct nationality.

Also, if we followed literature of everything, it would be stifling scientific theory.

The, so called, Kumari Kandam lies predominantly in the Indian Ocean. The tamil historians claim the Kumari Kandam was submerged under water due to melting of the ice caps. Even if all the present day’s ice in the world melts, the sea level rises only by 216 feet(65.83 meters). The average depth of Indian Ocean is 12,990 feet(3,960 meters). Imagine the quantity of ice to be present at the poles in order to raise the sea level by almost 4 kilometers and submerge the Kumari Kandam.

Every one knows how the Himalayas are formed in the northern part of India. The Himalayas are formed due to the Continental Drift. The Indian, African, Australian and South American Plates drift towards the Northern American and Eurasian Plates and collide with them. The Indian plate on colliding with the Eurasian plate, formed the Himalayas. If this is the case, where did the Kumari Kandam come from?

As the average depth of Indian Ocean is 4 kms, the depth of the Kumari Kandam can be assumed to be close to 4 kms or even deeper. How can such a huge area of low lying land of Kumari Kandam can be formed amidst the high lying India, Africa and Australia?

Just don't spew Dravidian bs here. I take it with a pinch of salt.

Even in Odisha, there's legends of an island of plenty, a paradise, near Java Sumatra known as Suvarnabhumi.

It was touted to have unimaginable gold and gems, and how even Gods used to come there.

Does it mean it was real¿ Nope. The average odia guy doesn't even believe in it.

Know why Kumari/Lemuria is dangerous? Because people ACTUALLY believe it was real, when it is clearly false, and propagate their theory. This is misinformation, which has become embedded deeply now. It's my job to make sure to bash all sides of non scientific spectrum, whether it be Dravidian nationalists, bong nationalists, trad hindu nationalists and so on.

Hindu Ram Rajya smh President, seems to be breaking the rules yourself:P
Double posting, no spoilers smh

Indusse wrote:

Hindu Ram Rajya smh President, seems to be breaking the rules yourself:P
Double posting, no spoilers smh

Yes i get triggered when no science sorry

Hindu Ram Rajya wrote:

Yes i get triggered when no science sorry

xD

Hello guys

Dancsin wrote:

Hello guys

Hi

Click to show...

Indusse wrote:

Utter nonsense
Kumari Kandam is a legit theory, it's just Lemuria. The reason you find it as Dravidian Nationalist stuff is due to its Tamil influence and why there exists a Tamil influence? That's because the existence of the supercontinent was first mentioned in Tamil epic. Also these Sangam Literature ain't sh*t stuff but those which talk about the history of South India.

Hindu Ram Rajya wrote:

You sound like a Dravidian nationalist indeed.

It is not only false but utter bs from a scientific point of view which makes as much sense as Atlantis or Kailash being thousands of yojanas with jewel encrusted sides. It sounds very good on paper and stuff, but at the end of the day is merely mythology and not real stuff.

Dravidian nationalists often try to push the idea of Lemuria, in order to have a basis of distinct nationality.

Also, if we followed literature of everything, it would be stifling scientific theory.

The, so called, Kumari Kandam lies predominantly in the Indian Ocean. The tamil historians claim the Kumari Kandam was submerged under water due to melting of the ice caps. Even if all the present day’s ice in the world melts, the sea level rises only by 216 feet(65.83 meters). The average depth of Indian Ocean is 12,990 feet(3,960 meters). Imagine the quantity of ice to be present at the poles in order to raise the sea level by almost 4 kilometers and submerge the Kumari Kandam.

Every one knows how the Himalayas are formed in the northern part of India. The Himalayas are formed due to the Continental Drift. The Indian, African, Australian and South American Plates drift towards the Northern American and Eurasian Plates and collide with them. The Indian plate on colliding with the Eurasian plate, formed the Himalayas. If this is the case, where did the Kumari Kandam come from?

As the average depth of Indian Ocean is 4 kms, the depth of the Kumari Kandam can be assumed to be close to 4 kms or even deeper. How can such a huge area of low lying land of Kumari Kandam can be formed amidst the high lying India, Africa and Australia?

Just don't spew Dravidian bs here. I take it with a pinch of salt.

Hindu Ram Rajya wrote:

Even in Odisha, there's legends of an island of plenty, a paradise, near Java Sumatra known as Suvarnabhumi.

It was touted to have unimaginable gold and gems, and how even Gods used to come there.

Does it mean it was real¿ Nope. The average odia guy doesn't even believe in it.

Know why Kumari/Lemuria is dangerous? Because people ACTUALLY believe it was real, when it is clearly false, and propagate their theory. This is misinformation, which has become embedded deeply now. It's my job to make sure to bash all sides of non scientific spectrum, whether it be Dravidian nationalists, bong nationalists, trad hindu nationalists and so on.

Kumari kandam is in Gujarat because i say so
end of the debate gz
(disagree= ban)

Gujarati Republic wrote:

Click to show...

Kumari kandam is in Gujarat because i say so
end of the debate gz
(disagree= ban)

wait this was not how it was supposed to end

This RMB is the only reason I'm still on NS XD

Feausi wrote:

This RMB is the only reason I'm still on NS XD

Lol true gonna love the rmb

Mithulla wrote:

You know what that means Discussion topic 6. What is the potential of india and if we really try by 40 years from now where can we get

Well if I say so. We really don't know. We had potential to beat China and USA but we had proved track record of loosing opportunity.
All the workforce and cheap labour advantage is max for next 15-20 years. After that India population will also start ageing. Certainly FDI and unicorns will continue to grow. And since we align with USA strategy for China, it will help us. But all depends on how the youth of India will perform in next 10 years, whether they want to have a leisure life in Government offices or work hard in their startups.

Hindu Ram Rajya wrote:

Yes i get triggered when no science sorry

1) Rational Thinking
2) Free Will
3) Science
The 3 gods that I follow.

Do you guys think that the government should put a ban on the advertisement of fairness products?

Aratartopia wrote:

Do you guys think that the government should put a ban on the advertisement of fairness products?

The fair skin ads are definitely not a good look on our culture or society however banning it is taking it a step too far. Condemning them probably a good idea however though banning them is a bit too much

Aratartopia wrote:

I think we should ban them. They can advertise them as an acne cream or a cram that makes your skin healthy because they are not considerate to the majority of the Indian population. I am North Indian and there are only a few people that look like that!

It promotes rascism in asia. Ban IT!!!!!!!!

One more question, why did Pakistan fail? And fail as in non-democratic. India and Pakistan started out during the same time and I would even say that India had it more difficult because we have an extremely diverse population that was spread across a large area.

Aratartopia wrote:

One more question, why did Pakistan fail? And fail as in non-democratic. India and Pakistan started out during the same time and I would even say that India had it more difficult because we have an extremely diverse population that was spread across a large area.

Probably allowing too many extremist groups to flourish in their land.