3

DispatchBulletinPolicy

by The Culture Blossom Commonwealth of North Prarie. . 14 reads.

SC Recommendation Dashboard: Vote AGAINST 'Condemn Ravana' | OWL

.

·

·
·

·


'Condemn Ravana'
·
·
..
·

Background Information

Proposal title: 'Condemn Ravana'
Author: Can No Rey
Purpose: To Condemn the region of Ravana for their actions against the region of Lasagna

Links


Vote .Against.
·

The Office's Analysis

The resolution, plainly, is terribly written and does a bad job of articulating its points. Even if the resolution was cleaned up and formatted well, it is pointless to condemn a region for its petty dispute with another region and it does not warrant attention from the World Assembly.

Supplementary Opinions
·
·
FOR | AGAINST
·

For

From TSP Citizens

From the World

Against

From TSP Citizens

FiHami is the Minister of Military Affairs for the South Pacific, known widely as Phoenix. She posted the following on Discord on behalf of the Cabinet of the South Pacific:

FiHami wrote:This honestly just reads like a feud between 2 regions. Not condemnable imo.

From the World

Bhang Bhang Duc is an experienced World Assembly commentator, and a former Delegate, Guardian, and Minister of World Assembly Affairs for the West Pacific. They posted the following on the Security Council forums:

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Finally managed to get a legal proposal after four attempts. You’d think with all those rewrites the author would have come up with something half decent. Unfortunately not. Mind you the attempt by Nopengie to condemn Lasagna was also pretty shocking in terms of quality. Let’s face it this is just a petty dispute between two very minor regions and not worth wasting the SC’s time with. Take your childish arguments elsewhere.

Victoria Pond is a citizen of Ravana, the target of the condemnation. They posted the following on the Security Council forums:

Victoria Pond wrote:As much as I would like to be condemned by this mighty council, I would like for that badge of dishonor to come from a worthy act of villainy rather than…whatever this is. This proposal trivializes the functions of the Security Council and the World Assembly by calling on it to justify the political intentions of a single region (by demonizing another) and intentionally misleads the good and honest voters of this body in order to do so. The resolution is primarily concerned with two allegations: 1. Ravana has destabilized regions and 2. Ravana is belligerent in tone. The first allegation is a carefully crafted lie and the second allegation falls far below the purview of this mighty and noble council. Consider clauses Disgusted, Horrified, and Further Noting. Each accuses Ravana of engaging in “destabilizing” behavior. The term “stabilized” as it is used in clause Disgusted is a meaningless buzzword designed to trick the voting public into thinking there was some sort of community hard at work rebuilding their region before being mercilessly attacked. The actual region in question, Lasagna Part Two, is a puppet dump with no native community. This topic was argued exhaustively by more professional members of the WA when Lasagna’s allies attempted to pass a Liberation Proposal for the same region less than two weeks ago. Council of Regions was a similarly empty wasteland. Finally, the resolution’s author makes the baffling argument in clause Further Noting that, “Lasagna was in the middle of working to stabilize several regions but that ravana's deceleration of war has caused many regions that needed Lasagna's help have received none.[sic]” Is one region to be held responsible for the hypothetical alternative actions of another region? Secondary to the main issue, this resolution is deeply concerned with the language Ravana has used. Clauses Disturbed, Sickened, Shocked, Noting, Shocked (again), and Angered all condemn Ravana for speaking in hostile tones. To be perfectly clear, no member of Ravana has been cited for disciplinary action by the proper authorities and all its official correspondence has strictly adhered to the NS Code of Conduct (something the author’s region cannot boast). I cannot think of another Security Council proposal that condemned a region for being rude and I can’t help but notice that the resolution is void of any relevant quotes or examples of the alleged behavior. Before voting on this resolution, demand these answers from the author: Where can I find a native member of the destabilized regional communities you speak of? Where can I find the regions you were supposedly prevented from helping and how were you prevented from helping them? Where can I find quotes evincing a hostile and belligerent culture deeply rooted within the accused region? This is indeed a petty regional dispute. I apologize on behalf of my region to everyone in the world community who has been forced to read and re-read these proposals. I would encourage you to strike down this proposal if for no other reason than to exact a satisfying vengeance on us for having wasted so much of your time.



·

·
LinkLink
·
·

RawReport